I'm Onyx, 25 and from Worthing, a crappy little seaside town in southern England. This blog is mostly for my photos, drawings, and other randomness.
Interests include animals, particularly foxes, (which I also enjoy photographing), taxidermy, music, (especially prog rock!), cemeteries and various other stuff. Yeah. o_O

My other blogs;
The Urban Fox Watcher
How To Skin A Tiger
The Canid Compendium

My Etsy Shop: TheFoxBrush

2nd June 2013

Photo with 216 notes

Here’s a fascinating photo I’ve never seen before from the book I brought today.
It’s captioned as a mounted specimen, but there’s no way it’s a piece of taxidermy. It’s too flawless for even a modern piece, let alone a historical mount. The anatomy and head shape are perfect (I’ve never seen a single mounted thylacine with the correct head), ears are perfect, nose is still plump and shiny etc. Also notice it’s eyes are closed, (why would you mount it with closed eyes?)
Also look carefully at the neck. There appears to be a completely bald patch all the way around with possible cuts, suggesting the animal had been caught in a snare or similar device. This can only be either a live animal, or, as I suspect, a recently killed one.
I believe this is an animal killed in a snare, either deliberately or by accident, and posed to look stuffed. It also looks like the photo could have been taken much later then the extinction date of the thylacine. Unfortunately as there’s no more data with the photograph it’s impossible to say when or where it was taken, but if it was post-1936 it’s absolute proof that thylacines did continue to exist past that date!
I shall have to do some digging and see if I can find any more info on this photo.

Here’s a fascinating photo I’ve never seen before from the book I brought today.

It’s captioned as a mounted specimen, but there’s no way it’s a piece of taxidermy. It’s too flawless for even a modern piece, let alone a historical mount. The anatomy and head shape are perfect (I’ve never seen a single mounted thylacine with the correct head), ears are perfect, nose is still plump and shiny etc. Also notice it’s eyes are closed, (why would you mount it with closed eyes?)

Also look carefully at the neck. There appears to be a completely bald patch all the way around with possible cuts, suggesting the animal had been caught in a snare or similar device. This can only be either a live animal, or, as I suspect, a recently killed one.

I believe this is an animal killed in a snare, either deliberately or by accident, and posed to look stuffed. It also looks like the photo could have been taken much later then the extinction date of the thylacine. Unfortunately as there’s no more data with the photograph it’s impossible to say when or where it was taken, but if it was post-1936 it’s absolute proof that thylacines did continue to exist past that date!

I shall have to do some digging and see if I can find any more info on this photo.

Tagged: thylacinetasmanian tigercrytozoologycryptid

  1. therealdbull reblogged this from urbanmongoose
  2. kyoushiro reblogged this from snful
  3. snful reblogged this from ladypurpalduckz
  4. ladypurpalduckz reblogged this from urbanmongoose
  5. lova-luna reblogged this from urbanmongoose
  6. kushling reblogged this from saagai
  7. saagai reblogged this from lostbeasts
  8. grausamblau reblogged this from lostbeasts
  9. distortsuburbia reblogged this from naturepunk
  10. ace-of-cake reblogged this from lostbeasts
  11. kadytheredpanda reblogged this from urbanmongoose
  12. armchair-zoologist reblogged this from howtoskinatiger
  13. wuffington reblogged this from naturepunk
  14. parastatic reblogged this from dogfang
  15. dognie reblogged this from dogfang
  16. dogfang reblogged this from naturepunk and added:
    urbanmongoose
  17. cheefbroom reblogged this from naturepunk